The same relationship, described twice.
“I am always the one trying to fix what goes wrong between us.”
“I stopped bringing things up because they always turn into a repair project.”
Two people can live inside the same relationship and experience two completely different relationships. Neither sentence above is a lie. WORTH does not decide which one is accurate — it measures how far apart they are.
We almost never fight.
Move the lens across the sentence — or use the reveal control — to read the layer underneath.
The Gap.
The distance between what you feel, what they feel, and what each of you thinks the other feels. Measured across eight dimensions, without a verdict attached.
A gap is not a failure. A gap you cannot see is the expensive one.
Chemistry is not compatibility
Chemistry
Immediate. It arrives before you know anything, and it tells you almost nothing about an ordinary Tuesday two years from now.
Compatibility
Structural. It is built out of how you argue, what you each call support, and whether you are describing the same future when you say the word “later”.
Eight dimensions, read from both sides.
Emotional connection
How seen each person feels day to day.
Communication
Whether difficult conversations reach an ending both recognise.
Trust & safety
Confidence that the relationship holds under pressure.
Reciprocity
Perceived balance of effort, attention and repair.
Intimacy
Closeness, desire and the freedom to ask for it.
Autonomy
Room to remain a separate person inside the relationship.
Values & lifestyle
Agreement about how an ordinary life should be lived.
Future alignment
Whether both are describing the same future.
A method, then intelligence on top of it.
The numbers are deterministic: the same answers always produce the same distances. The reading on top of them is done by embedded intelligence — sentiment, cross-answer comparison, cause attribution across the eight domains.
Normalisation
Every answer is put on the same footing — scales, forced choices and written reflections become one comparable structure across the eight dimensions.
Distance metrics
A deterministic engine computes experience, alignment, perception gap, reciprocity and friction. No model touches these numbers: the same answers always produce the same result.
Sentiment and tone
Embedded intelligence reads how each of you wrote — certainty, resignation, care, avoidance — separately for each partner, before either account is compared to the other.
Cross-answer reading
Your account is read against theirs, including what each of you believed the other would say. Contradictions and quiet agreements both surface here.
Cause attribution
The analysis names which dimension is driving the friction, not only where the friction shows. A communication symptom often has a trust or reciprocity cause.
Conversation synthesis
The reading ends in three to five conversations worth actually having, each traceable back to the answers that produced it.
It never scores your worth as a person.
It never issues a verdict on the relationship.
It never predicts whether you will last.
It never tells you to stay or to leave.